Who stood to benefit from the cheating on tests?

The choice of Kate and Constance as the beneficiaries of cheating on tests is notable because throughout the story, they demonstrate a strong determination to succeed and prove their capabilities. Cheating undermines the integrity of their achievement, but in context, it exposes the lengths to which they and others might go to gain an advantage in a system that often rewards conformity and rote learning.

In the narrative, Kate is characterized by her resourcefulness and tenacity, while Constance, despite being underestimated by many, displays tenacity and clever strategies throughout their journey. Their potential benefit from cheating could stem from a desire to overcome obstacles and evade the rigid educational standards set by Mr. Benedict’s adversaries.

The other options—teachers, Reynie and Sticky, and Martina Crowe—would not gain from the act of cheating in the same way. Teachers are invested in fostering genuine learning, while Reynie and Sticky value intellect and collaboration over dishonest practices. Martina Crowe, representing authority and control, is more interested in manipulation to enhance her own power rather than benefiting from students' dishonesty. Thus, Kate and Constance best encapsulate the idea of finding advantage through cheating within the context of their struggle against an unjust system.